similarminds.com
 
 
similarminds.com
      
Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages

Log inLog in  RegisterRegister


Profile  Search  Memberlist  FAQ 
effects of a primary intellectual orientation
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    similarminds.com Forum Index -> The Intellectual Life
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
dionysusAJ
Member


Joined: 31 Oct 2004
Posts: 28

PostPosted: Mon Apr 04, 2005 9:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

sit up lucky mud wrote:
Can you recall a time\place in your life when you sort of boarded the intellectual train, per say? And at this time did you feel in a somewhat euphoric state of wonder\vain brooding, that you can't exactly revist anymore? (In the sense that asking questions was all quite new and unexplored) and do you ever wish to feel that same childlike ntellectual fascination again? do we ever really loose it...?

I read a lot as a child as a way to escape into other worlds. I was around adults a lot and my siblings were much older, so usually I only had myself as entertainment. I had a few friends who would come around, but my family was very strict with things, so that wasn't often. I would often explore in the woods near my house and I guess it was then that I realized how much I loved learning.

I still have that childlike sense of wonder.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PiccoloNamek
Newbie


Joined: 18 Apr 2005
Posts: 4

PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2005 6:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

How is life as an intellectual? To put it bluntly, pretty crappy. It all starts going downhill when you realize that 99.99% of people in the world walk through life without ever thinking about or questioning anything. The blank, unknowing, uncaring looks on their faces! I can't stand even stand the sight of them! It must be horrible to lead such a shallow existance... but then again, they probably aren't smart enough to realize how horrible it is.

To quote one of my favorite video games ever: "Most men complacently accept "knowledge" as "truth"; they are sheep, ruled by fear." -Sydney Losstarot

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mother
Newbie


Joined: 19 Apr 2005
Posts: 5

PostPosted: Tue Apr 19, 2005 3:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

How is life as an Intellectual???

I find this a bizzare platform for a forum. Have you all gone completely mad? life as an intellectual is no different than life as anybody struggling to come to terms with who they are...... All this 'nobody understands', and 'how many long words can I get into a sentence?' is quite frankly embarrassing. Do you all spend your time whining about the difficulties of being accepted by others? Perhaps all that is needed to make life more interesting for a so called intellectual is a little respect for your fellow beings. I find the arrogance of the 'intellectuals' mind-bogglingly scary. If you want to go and sit in a corner and read a book or talk endlessly about concepts and philosophy why do you need the acceptance of the general population? Has all your intellectualising addled your brains? Has it ever occured to anyone that say a pig farmer might get frustrated at the ignorance of city folk who assume pig farming isn't worhty of note. Or, a hairstylist may be trying to tell someone that isn't interested, about a new product or style, he/she would have to accept that the person he/she is talking to isn't interested. I suggest you intellectuals need to do the exact same thing and assume that the people you are trying to tell are not interested and that if you all flock together that is just fine and dandy, just because you have all given yourself the Intellectual label doesn't make you any different to any other person. Just deal with it with a little more grace.

Ps. I may not be an intellectual by everyone elses standards but I do recognise whining when I see it, and there are pages of it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
grek0
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 1:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

loool go Mom go!!
Back to top
Guest_Vylence
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Apr 30, 2005 12:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

You are saying we aren't entitled to whine? And yes I like to believe I am intellectual.

In the cosmic scheme of things I really don't think I am any better off than a pig farmer. Though I am very different then the average pig farmer, just in the terms of what I do in the average day. Basically you are saying that we look down on others because they do something different, same as they do.

Though personally I don't see it that way, I try to find ways that most people are the same. There will always still be differences. And with this fact in mind I find most think about their situation yes, but some look beyond their place. The real difference I think most intellectuals are griping about is that if pressed we could sympathize with them, but they can't with us. Or at least choose not to. The arguement I guess is that we the minority spend more time understanding them, then they spend understanding us. Which means we look beyond our place.

Thats a tenous arguement to make really. How many Astro physicists know the nuances of flipping burgers? Few to be sure. How many burger flippers have degrees?

Hmmm, kinda lost where I was going here.

Really anyone should have a right to complain, if this is a argument of minorty vs. the majority. Should we as intellectuals be pushing civilization towards everyone being intellectual?

Can anyone have the right to be pushing for a majority. It seems yes, in the majority you obviously get perks over the minority. Simple enough to see that. So, yes, it does come down to us pushing against them.

And if the arguement is whether, again, there is any difference between us and them, we have to define ourselves. What is an intellectual? Really to be funny it could be as simple as someone who cares to think there is a difference between themselves and a majority. Which is kinda funny. Funny in that how many differences can there be if everyone can just decide there is a difference.

Oh well, that thought of burgers made me hungry for one.
Back to top
invicta
Advanced Member


Joined: 17 Jun 2004
Posts: 416

PostPosted: Sat Apr 30, 2005 2:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't think there is a reason to compare occupation to occupation if we want to discuss intellecutalism.

Much of science is simply collecting information, not necessarily using it in innovative ways...science is highly compartmentalised. And if we are even going to make a passing nod at academia, well much of that is just time wasting for political reasons.

Your pig farmer, on the other hand, has all day to intellectualize, the pigs are not going to be taking up his time with beaureaucratic nonsense. As does your burger flipper. People can be as intellectual as they choose, it makes no difference what they do for money.

The difference is this: People that want to learn do.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
JJ
Guest





PostPosted: Sun May 01, 2005 1:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

"Really anyone should have a right to complain"

Yep, and others have the right to call him a whining baby.
Back to top
bigdorkpeter
Newbie


Joined: 03 May 2005
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2005 6:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sorry, Mom, but my deployment of a narcissistic defense doesn't falsify the contents of my statement. This also refers back to the Jung quote someone posted. Unlike Jung, philosophers realize that, logically, any ad hominem argument is garbage.

I may as well remain on the high horse while I claim that everyday people suffer from Heideggerian "fallenness" whereas I, as a deep-thinking intellectual Wink, have more perspective. Yet it is precisely this that makes life more difficult for me.

Aside from this Myers-Briggs stuff, is there anyone else out there who considers herself/himself to be characterologically schizoid? The psychoanalytic model I'm familiar with places character type on one axis (schizoid, narcissistic, antisocial, depressive, etc...) and organization level/functioning on the other ("normal" --> neurotic --> borderline --> psychotic.) I.e., on this view you can have any of the character types as dominant while still being functional and mentally healthy. Also, healthier people exibit a wider range of behaviors and defenses than those who are less healthy. At the borderline and psychotic levels behaviors become more stereotyped.

Anyway, this sort of model makes sense to me and I consider myself to be a schizoid at the normal (or sometimes neurotic Wink end of the scale.

--I don't feel like I belong in any group or subculture (I'm an "artist" but not this sort of bohemian hipster-type I see everywhere here in Brooklyn. After all, nonconformists are simply conforming to different norms.) I can't date anyone because they're too uninteresting or shallow. I've thought about placing a personal ad to the tune of "Male Schizoid Personality seeks Female Schizoid Personality for staring contest."

--I get lost in trance-like thought & fantasy, I can think of tons of photographs to take but hardly ever get around to taking them. I go to bars but find that the 300 pound gorilla from New Jersey sitting next to me is better at meeting women than I am--not that I have any specific sexuality to begin with. My jokes are often obtuse and absurd.

--And I find writing academic papers to be orgasmic fun, especially when I can think of tight, complex sentences and write about hilarious philosophical concepts like the Nothing. Oh, give me more, baby!

--There's nothing I hate more than people who think they can defeat my argument despite not being able to understand that they aren't really speaking to the point I'm making. Got logic? Apparently not. Hence I avoid intellectual discussions.

Ultimately, I like myself the way I am. However, I wish I knew more people like me! I hate having to "dumb myself down" in order to have a conversation. I didn't used to do it but I must have seemed pretty eccentric at the time.

Anyway, sorry for the immense sililoquay or diatribe I've just written. This is an interesting thread.

"That's all very well and good in practice, but does it work in theory?" --Althusser
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
brainiac girl
Guest





PostPosted: Thu May 12, 2005 2:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Try living as an intellectual woman, interested in cosmology and quantum physics! Having masqueraded as a bimbo for most of my life in order to fit-in socially, and mostly keeping my intellect to myself not to bore or offend others, I find that as I get older I care less what others think and more what I think myself. I suppose it's like any other orientation to the world - mostly of interest to oneself. So I suppose seclusion has my vote.
Back to top
Leela
Advanced Member


Joined: 25 Apr 2004
Posts: 137
Location: California, US

PostPosted: Wed May 18, 2005 11:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

meta wrote:
what is life like if your primary orientation is intellectual?

Errr, what do you mean by "intellectual orientation?" Does that have much to do with one's personality? I don't suppose it is... a personality is made of of tendencies, and with various intelligences. I am an ENTP. I am socially knowledgable, with intuitive problem-solving skills,... etc. Are you generally meaning the introverted intellectuals? Are you asking about what life is like for those who proclaim that they fit that stereotype?

Okay, since I'm a youngun' who has analyzed philosophy since a relatively young age, I suppose I'll gratify myself and reply here.

How is life?
Life is good. I make friends with people who don't care about intelligence or philosophy or all that nonsense. I wear neutral, if not odd, clothes that do not attract attention (I wear one of a few sets of navy BDU uniforms every day). ...Because I tend to be outgoing, I am well regarded amongst the teachers and all them normal folk at the college I attend. Even though I am typed as an 8w9 and ENTP, I am seriously considering becoming a Buddhist nun. My intellegence doesn't do much for me, except get me in the occasional debate and remind me to loosen up.

I can say that the members of my immediate family are intellectuals (but it's hard to say about anyone, even myself, because I don't have much of a frame of reference). My mother finds my intellectual revelations to be disturbing, as it reminds her of when she was a disorganized schizophrenic. My father is quite proud that I have discovered Vedanta without the aid of him or any other outside influence, as he is a Hindu swami. My older sister is both proud and bitter about my sorts of intelligence, as she is more interested in politics and all that tempermental crap. I love the rest of my family, although not one family member outside of this household accepts my philosophical beliefs. This is a tad difficult, as I am the only member inside this household that wants to spend time with cousins, aunts, uncles, grandparents, second cousins, the whole lot. So I excitedly visit them, get in a debate, and then relieved to leave.

I am a might irritated by the female gender, though I happen to be a part of that group. First they don't stand up for themselves, then when they do crap, they generally whine, bitch and moan because they set up crazy internal political systems. It is your own damn fault if you feel society wants you to be a slut, because in reality, society doesn't fucking care. Even worse, when they expect you to become successful in the name of women's rights.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SIO
Advanced Member


Joined: 29 May 2005
Posts: 166

PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 7:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

LOL!!!

Intellectual : An intellectual is a person who uses his or her intellect to study, reflect, or speculate on a variety of different ideas.

Intellectual is a real word. But here it has become yet another label people pin on themselves for a feeling of superiority. No more, no less. It's really ironic though that here's a place full of "intellectuals" and most can't see past the label or the warm fuzzy feeling from calling themselves such. Creating this elitist group/whine session is an embarassment to humanity. If it wasn't for people like Mother, I'd have lost hope ages ago. But MAN, do I love the irony. IRONY IRONY IRONY! Keep it up, guys! Razz
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Vylence
Advanced Member


Joined: 27 May 2004
Posts: 193

PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 9:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Arg, SIO, maybe you don't spend lots of time with people who constantly question you or make you feel unusual for having different ideas, but I have. Some of this maybe whining but I have been around people that just tell me I think too much.

It can be hard to be around people that tell you no, they have never thought of the possiblity. No, it can't be true because they haven't thought of the possibility. And that yes you are odd because you did think of the possibility.

I understand that you could argue by your deffinition that anyone is intellectual. Though when you run into people who have never considered things you have, and disagree with you because it just is so different from the few things they have considered, or were told, you begin to see a distinction between yourself and them.

I understand that everyone doesn't have as much time to speculate as I do. I agree there are people out there who hate to speculate. I don't look down on these people. Though I also understand there are times when they don't want to get along with me, and there will be times I can't stand them.
_________________
9w1 sx, INTP
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
invicta
Advanced Member


Joined: 17 Jun 2004
Posts: 416

PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 12:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

SIO does not ingratiate him/herself. I like SIO.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
evolvingcode
Newbie


Joined: 27 Aug 2005
Posts: 8
Location: Australia

PostPosted: Sat Aug 27, 2005 1:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

invicta wrote:
At first I said to myself: "What a terrific joke--I'm an intellectual. Step aside pedestrian! An intellectual wishes to pass". I just can't imagine considering myself an intellectual, although I would certainly consider some--most definitely not all--of my interests to be intellectual.

1. intellectual, intellect -- (a person who uses the mind creatively)

2. intellectual, rational, noetic -- (of or associated with or requiring the use of the mind; "intellectual problems"; "the triumph of the rational over the animal side of man")

3. intellectual (vs. nonintellectual) -- (appealing to or using the intellect; "satire is an intellectual weapon"; "intellectual workers engaged in creative literary or artistic or scientific labor"; "has tremendous intellectual sympathy for oppressed people"; "coldly intellectual"; "sort of the intellectual type"; "intellectual literature")

4. cerebral (vs. emotional), intellectual -- (involving intelligence rather than emotions or instinct; "a cerebral approach to the problem"; "cerebral drama")


Ah ha! I had it all wrong...I should appreciate the intellectuals I meet for what they are. For the true intellectual--Everyone is Buddha except you.--Phil Hine

To take from my own experience:

Some label me a geek; if only that were true. Others complain about my inability to follow up on curiosities to substantiate a quality interaction. Actually, the quality portion of that statement is my addition to the argument. I would rather not have a baseline interaction without having done the research. Does the fact that the research rarely gets done due to alternate focuses & animalistic occupations - such as relaxation (though is it so animalistic when it's daydreaming?) mean that I am not a thinker?

Often it seems I can find belonging in neither of the two groups. And for the most part - two groups, there are. Neither willing to take a seat & let people just do what they do.

Must a person produce results to be intellectually indulgent? Is it necessary to fill the mind with junk-facts, when a few intelligible strings would serve much greater purpose? Or - is it about filling the mind with ‘junk’ that would produce greater connectivity & better thinking pathways in the long run?

Is it necessary to go to extremes? Must we stay up all night doggedly pursuing intellectual curiosities to fall under the realm of intellectual? I really don't care either way - but why do people seem to find the need to mark this checkbox? Why is the division between the so-called intellectual and the so-called non-intellectuals so willing to distinguish itself? Is the definition of creative and / or rational not enough? Is it the apparent paradox of these definitions that makes people so uncomfortable?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SIO
Advanced Member


Joined: 29 May 2005
Posts: 166

PostPosted: Fri Sep 02, 2005 11:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
"Shoulds" are only valuable, in my opinion, when the (often healthy) desire to change they stimulate is balanced with an understanding of what one does not wish to change, what is integral and desirable, though not necessarily popular.
Quote:
My final comment is that I think people beat themselves up a whole hell of a lot more than they need to -especially when young - about what they "should" be doing and "should" feel.


This is from another topic, thought it applied.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    similarminds.com Forum Index -> The Intellectual Life All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 4 of 5

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
test



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group