| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
RadicalDreamer Advanced Member

Joined: 03 Mar 2007 Posts: 4049
|
Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2007 2:09 pm Post subject: Society and Personality Type. Is it an adaptation |
|
|
For the most part of human history people lived as hunter-gatherers until around 10,000 years ago. I've been wondering how personality types dealt with this human society vs civilization. If some were more equipped in dealing with hunter-gatherer society vs civilization. Do you think the variety of personality types within a family is an adaptation? A motley crew more able to deal with any given environment.
Another question, do you think other mammals have similar personality types as humans? _________________
| Raven wrote: |  |
Function preference: Whatever my muse desires and requires at any given moment |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RUSS_B Advanced Member

Joined: 13 Mar 2007 Posts: 303
|
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 7:30 am Post subject: re - ptype |
|
|
I have a feeling people with an intuitive or psychic ability would've been burnt alive at the stake back in the medieval times for being a witch if they were a female , or a wizard if they were male.
Back 10,000 years ago I think man wouldn't have evolved well enough to have any sort of intuition, would've just had basic animal instincts & survival skills.
Though I am surprised how clever the Australian Aboriginies are , there was a show here called the "bush mechanics" and they showed off their ingenuity which they have been using for over 40,000 years , except it was applied to a car , which is of course more modern.
They were doing things such as using tree trunks as tailshafts , etc. _________________
Advocating creator |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kyle Advanced Member

Joined: 17 Mar 2005 Posts: 2210
|
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 5:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Back 10,000 years ago I think man wouldn't have evolved well enough to have any sort of intuition, would've just had basic animal instincts & survival skills. |
But...... That's what intuition is....
I would argue that animals have better instincts than many humans.
We can go deeper into things, but pfft...
To the extent people use their intuition, I wouldn't trust it one bit.
10,000 years ago, we 'played into' our instincts, rather than constantly fighting them...
We did the thing every other species naturally does.
Today, we put it instinct on the back burner.
This takes away the intuitive power.
Intuition/Instinct is WAY more than you could imagine.
Playing into your impulses, and assuming... "If i didn't want it, I wouldnt be considering it.. It must be right...."
Then learning how to trust, and take care of yourself while doing it... _________________ New levels of truth come from new levels of understanding.
Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/kylewkeith
Save my band: http://sites.google.com/site/savetheascendents/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RadicalDreamer Advanced Member

Joined: 03 Mar 2007 Posts: 4049
|
Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 2:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Russ, I have a feeling if people didn't follow the program they'd be in trouble in some parts in the history of mankind.
So animals probably have N and S. I know they have E and I.
we can find a documented account of the personalities of a variety of wolves held in captivity. The observer characterizes one male wolf as lordly, timid, and luxury-loving. Another wolf, a female, was described as being fearless, happy, playful, and inventive. Another female was described as a hearty, affectionate, not jealous, and of the undemanding sort. One male was seen as aggressive. Finally, the observer described another female as being sober, gentle, and withdrawn.
http://www.wolfsongalaska.org/wolf_personality.htm
Wolf society sounds like human society somewhat
http://www.wolfpark.org/wolffaq.html#livetogether _________________
| Raven wrote: |  |
Function preference: Whatever my muse desires and requires at any given moment |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
artica Advanced Member

Joined: 06 Apr 2007 Posts: 424 Location: Winter Park, fl
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RadicalDreamer Advanced Member

Joined: 03 Mar 2007 Posts: 4049
|
Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 5:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Russ you might find this interesting!
Until about 50,000–40,000 years ago the use of stone tools seems to have progressed stepwise: each phase (habilis, ergaster, neanderthal) started at a higher level than the previous one, but once that phase had started further development was slow. In other words, one might call these Homo species culturally conservative. After 50,000 BP, what Jared Diamond, author of The Third Chimpanzee, and other anthropologists characterize as a Great Leap Forward, human culture apparently started to change at much greater speed: "modern" humans started to bury their dead carefully, made clothing out of hides, developed sophisticated hunting techniques (such as pitfall traps, or driving animals to fall off cliffs), and made cave paintings. This speed-up of cultural change seems connected with the arrival of modern humans, homo sapiens sapiens. As human culture advanced, different populations of humans began to create novelty in existing technologies. Artifacts such as fish hooks, buttons and bone needles begin to show signs of variation among different population of humans, something that had not been seen in human cultures prior to 50,000 BP. Typically, neanderthalenis populations are found with technology similar to other contemporary neanderthalensis populations.
Theoretically, modern human behavior is taken to include four ingredient capabilities: abstract thinking (concepts free from specific examples), planning (taking steps to achieve a farther goal), innovation (finding new solutions), and symbolic behaviour (such as images, or rituals). Among concrete examples of modern human behaviour, anthropologists include specialization of tools, use of jewelry and images (such as cave drawings), organization of living space, rituals (for example, burials with grave gifts), specialized hunting techniques, exploration of less hospitable geographical areas, and barter trade networks. Debate continues whether there was indeed a "Revolution" leading to modern man ("the big bang of human consciousness"), or a more gradual evolution.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_evolution
I guess intuition works by taking in some nuggets of information and forming a picture of what is possible. _________________
| Raven wrote: |  |
Function preference: Whatever my muse desires and requires at any given moment |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lizbert Advanced Member

Joined: 10 Apr 2007 Posts: 120 Location: portland, OR
|
Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 6:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Kyle wrote: | | Quote: | | Back 10,000 years ago I think man wouldn't have evolved well enough to have any sort of intuition, would've just had basic animal instincts & survival skills. |
But...... That's what intuition is.... |
EXACTLY. intuition is a trait favored by natural selection for a variety of outcomes. in that sense, being "intuitive" is a good evolutionary strategy.
in authoritarian/dogmatic periods of human history (e.g. the inquisition) intuitives have been stigmatized as "other" and persecuted. but that persecution/stigmatization has never been sufficient to eradicate the effectiveness of intuitive strategies.
i suspect that all of the MB types arise from some sort of adaptive pragmatism. that doesn't, however, mean that we're necessarily subject to either our MB type or its likely outcomes. _________________ ENFJ... vox clamantis in deserto, dude. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
clockworksmile Advanced Member

Joined: 05 Mar 2007 Posts: 126 Location: USA
|
Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 6:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| artica wrote: | Could anyone possibly explain to me how intuition works?
I mean...how it developes and how it can possibly be measured? |
There's a book out there called "Blink" by Malcolm Gladwell, and it's the physiological and neurological science of intuition. It also goes so far as to make the case for intuition as precursor for cognition, the inability of robotics to recreate intuition, and the genes behind it.
I think it's 7.99 on Amazon.com. _________________ INTP/J, so/sx
“I heard about the Downfall of Western civilization, and thought it was something I'd like to be involved in. -George Carlin |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
artica Advanced Member

Joined: 06 Apr 2007 Posts: 424 Location: Winter Park, fl
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ericj Advanced Member

Joined: 06 Mar 2007 Posts: 685 Location: Reno, NV USA
|
Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 10:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| artica wrote: | Off tangent here......just a theory.....Do most people end up "naturally" selecting their favorite authors in which they share similar MBTI types?
As in the natural gravitation in which like attracts like? |
Perhaps, or they're naturally attracted to similarly typed characters within the story (because they can relate to them best/form an identity with them). _________________ INFJ
RCoa|I|
"Ideas started churning around like mad inside my teetering bulb of dread and dream." -- Hofstadter |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
artica Advanced Member

Joined: 06 Apr 2007 Posts: 424 Location: Winter Park, fl
|
Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 11:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ericj wrote: | | artica wrote: | Off tangent here......just a theory.....Do most people end up "naturally" selecting their favorite authors in which they share similar MBTI types?
As in the natural gravitation in which like attracts like? |
Perhaps, or they're naturally attracted to similarly typed characters within the story (because they can relate to them best/form an identity with them). |
Splendid! _________________ Visit my page and music myspaces to figure out my type.
Me:
http://www.myspace.com/gideon_green
The OLD band:
http://www.myspace.com/articaworldwide
The NEW band:
http://www.myspace.com/princetonrock |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ericj Advanced Member

Joined: 06 Mar 2007 Posts: 685 Location: Reno, NV USA
|
Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 11:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| artica wrote: | | ericj wrote: | | artica wrote: | Off tangent here......just a theory.....Do most people end up "naturally" selecting their favorite authors in which they share similar MBTI types?
As in the natural gravitation in which like attracts like? |
Perhaps, or they're naturally attracted to similarly typed characters within the story (because they can relate to them best/form an identity with them). |
Splendid! |
This thought came to me because I *just* read a book yesterday where I identified closely with the protagonist. He was a huge INFJ, and we struggled along together though the novel, he and I.  _________________ INFJ
RCoa|I|
"Ideas started churning around like mad inside my teetering bulb of dread and dream." -- Hofstadter |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
artica Advanced Member

Joined: 06 Apr 2007 Posts: 424 Location: Winter Park, fl
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ericj Advanced Member

Joined: 06 Mar 2007 Posts: 685 Location: Reno, NV USA
|
Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 11:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The Sorrows of Young Werther by Goethe _________________ INFJ
RCoa|I|
"Ideas started churning around like mad inside my teetering bulb of dread and dream." -- Hofstadter |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
YofterMofter Advanced Member

Joined: 15 Mar 2007 Posts: 1345
|
Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 4:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
They say Goethe himself was INFJ, too, so it's only natural to write all the stories about "yourself". Now writing about different kind of people, that's FUN!  _________________ “Atheism is a religion like not collecting stamps is a hobby.” - James Randi |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
test
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|