similarminds.com
 
 
similarminds.com
      
Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages

Log inLog in  RegisterRegister


Profile  Search  Memberlist  FAQ 
RLUEI
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    similarminds.com Forum Index -> Big 5 / Global 5 / SLOAN Type Descriptions
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
meta
Advanced Member


Joined: 30 Dec 2003
Posts: 455

PostPosted: Mon Jul 04, 2005 1:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Post descriptions or anecdotes or start a discussion on this personality type here.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
eques
Newbie


Joined: 18 Aug 2005
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Thu Aug 18, 2005 12:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've taken this test, and I came up with RLUEI.

I realize it's just an evaluation, and that all evaluations are subject to flaws... but, man, just about all of the aspects of my personality are negative according to this test! It is as if there is not a positive thing to be found in me, and I know that is absolutely untrue.

There are positive and negative aspects to each kind of personality. There should be a balanced view. The description for RLUEI just sounds like I simply don't measure up to some as-yet-unrevealed standard.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
K
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Aug 20, 2005 3:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think that's the point, it's ONLY negative traits. Which I think is fascinating -- you're not buttered up about how great you are but, rather, told what you need to work on or watch out for. In my case, wow, this was dead on. o.o
Back to top
inquisitive
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Aug 25, 2005 7:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

K wrote:
I think that's the point, it's ONLY negative traits. Which I think is fascinating -- you're not buttered up about how great you are but, rather, told what you need to work on or watch out for. In my case, wow, this was dead on. o.o

I agree with K. It's better to know what to look for and then change for the better if you want to be a better person.

The only problem though with changing negative traits is that it's always harder to change something bad about yourself and always so easy to pick up another habit.
Back to top
Shan'do Stormrage
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2005 6:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

eh, pretty negative, now i feel depressed, wheres my razors
Back to top
ash
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Sep 20, 2005 5:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

this is why i believe i'm doomed for damnation Sad
Back to top
bava
Member


Joined: 15 Sep 2005
Posts: 13

PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2005 11:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

(thanks below for the quote)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Shan'do Stormrage
Newbie


Joined: 31 Aug 2005
Posts: 5

PostPosted: Tue Sep 27, 2005 10:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

bava wrote:
Are you also INTP's? Hmm. Let's look at it right. I know myself, and when I'm stuck and feel I can't get out of it, yes, all those things are there. But they are a collection of traits that come from a chronic condition unnatural to one's effectiveness and true self. Let's face it, you want to be really into something, really doing something great. But it isn't happening. You're capacities and urges are beyond what people and the environment offer. So, maybe the key is to get into something that doesn't bore or make life meaningless. I think the whole thing can be turned around by being immersed into something truly wonderful. For me it is just great creative work. I don't look for gratification or recognition. "Just throw money". Suppose you liked to sing and some agent took you up and suddenly you became a big star. I think you'd be smiling a lot more. Life would just carry you away into other dimensions. OK maybe bad episodes would come around and block the joy. But this is really a condition that has to do with the present circumstances. Change them and, voila!, somehow you're a different type. Some people are married to misery because their partners are the opposite of what they deeply need, especially if they need a lot of love and encouragement. So, a test result may relate to the relationship, forgetting about others. Also, a lot of people who feel they "missed the boat" fall into these categories. But that is social engineering where the individual is dominated by the standards and conventions of the masses around him or her and what authority figures say. Imagine a 15 year old thinking it's all over! This is extreme short-sightedness and a block. For example people of 70 start new careers without a thought. Yes, we got this and that result. However, the world can be a truly depressing place and dreamers often tip-toe through the tulips increasing misery for others. Some people have been doing just that for a number years to the whole world.

^^^prolly the most lamest shit i've ever read.

I was being sarcastic when I said I was depressed!!

I like who I am... LONG LIVE THE RLUEIs
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Vagabond
Advanced Member


Joined: 18 Jan 2004
Posts: 463
Location: Boulevard of Broken Dreams

PostPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2005 2:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Shan'do Stormrage wrote:
^^^prolly the most lamest shit i've ever read.

I was being sarcastic when I said I was depressed!!

I like who I am... LONG LIVE THE RLUEIs

See that's a problem with this typing system... no way to tell apart INTPs and ISTPs, even extreme ones. "Long live the rlueis"? I mean, who goes for this type of crap.
_________________
Ο δικός μου ο δρόμος μ' έχει χρόνια διαλέξει...
INTP 5w4 sp/sx
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
meta
Advanced Member


Joined: 30 Dec 2003
Posts: 455

PostPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2005 4:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

vagabond - intps are far more likely to be an r_uei. you are just not used to considering the emotional instability element and how it manifests itself in crazed behavior like chanting "Long live the rlueis"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Shan'do Stormrage
Newbie


Joined: 31 Aug 2005
Posts: 5

PostPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2005 8:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

hahah please explain how chanting long live RLUEIs is crazy? how did you correlate the two, its clear to see this test only concentrates on the negative, and is deeply flawed. I'm not an intp! or an istp.. you judged my type from 37 words, well done! maybe you should each rub the only braincells you have together and make a fire!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
meta
Advanced Member


Joined: 30 Dec 2003
Posts: 455

PostPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2005 12:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

i said intps are far more likely to be an r_uei than istps... i did not say you were an intp.

limbic = emotionally unstable = crazed (although i was being mildly sarcastic when i said 'crazed behavior')
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Vagabond
Advanced Member


Joined: 18 Jan 2004
Posts: 463
Location: Boulevard of Broken Dreams

PostPosted: Thu Sep 29, 2005 3:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Who's that idiot that keeps messing with the site? There goes my most insighful reply (muahah). Anyways, too lazy to type the whole thing again, basically I was trying to say I am clear on the emotional instability factor, but an unstable ISTP is different than an unstable INTP. And since the N/S distinction is I think important to determine the way someone's mind works, imo it is something that is missing from this system. Shan'do Stormrage's post reminds me of a clear case of emotionally unstable ISTP (who thinks is an INTP, but nevermind). A sx INTP might score as RLUEI too, but they would have completely different ways of perceiving life and environment. A sx INTP RLUEI would be much more similar to a sp INTP RCUEI than to an ISTP RLUEI. So I am saying, this system is missing on that, even if the emotional stability factor is interesting and provides useful info.

(That was supposed to be a short version of my previous post... bleh)
_________________
Ο δικός μου ο δρόμος μ' έχει χρόνια διαλέξει...
INTP 5w4 sp/sx
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
Shan'do Stormrage
Newbie


Joined: 31 Aug 2005
Posts: 5

PostPosted: Thu Sep 29, 2005 8:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Vagabond wrote:
Shan'do Stormrage's post reminds me of a clear case of emotionally unstable ISTP (who thinks is an INTP, but nevermind).

You feel i'm an ISTP... dunno.. i've tested ENTP alot in the past, recently the E turned into I.. :ph34r:

ISTP's are most likely to be RCUEN, RLUEN. according to: Global 5 to Jung/MBTI/Kiersey Correlations

Here's a break down on the RLUAI

Reserved types are uncomfortable and/or disinterested with social interaction
Limbic types are prone to moodiness
Unstructured types are scattered
Egocentric types live for themselves
Inquisitive types are insatiable in their quest to know more

what is the RLUAI's place in the universe?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bava
Member


Joined: 15 Sep 2005
Posts: 13

PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2005 10:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Very fuzzy.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    similarminds.com Forum Index -> Big 5 / Global 5 / SLOAN Type Descriptions All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
test



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group